Crucial BX500 240GB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial BX500 240GB SATA III 2.5"

Crucial
39 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Crucial BX500 240GB SATA III 2.5"

72 out of 100 medium confidence 17 reviews

The Crucial BX500 is praised as a budget-friendly SSD that delivers significant performance improvements over mechanical drives, especially for boot times and program launches. Users appreciate its value and ease of installation, but note it runs hot and has poor manufacturer support. One unit arrived dead on arrival, though the reviewer's past experience with Crucial remains positive.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Significant speed boost over HDD
  • Easy installation
  • Backwards compatible with SATA I/II
  • Good for budget builds
Cons
  • Runs hot
  • Poor manufacturer support
  • Dead on arrival unit
  • No SATA cable included
  • Lower write endurance
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Performance improvement 5
👎 Heat generation 2
👎 Manufacturer support 2
🤔 Reliability 3
👍 Ease of installation 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Crucial
38
Seagate
91
Gaming
Crucial
25
Seagate
86
Console
Crucial
12
Seagate
84
Workstation
Crucial
36
Seagate
83
Budget
Crucial
82
Seagate
73
Portable
Crucial
10
Seagate
24

Specifications

Crucial BX500Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
240
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
540
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)
500
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
80
5,050
MTBF (hours)
1,500,000
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Crucial BX500 240GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong endurance (69th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average speed (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Crucial BX500 Better at:

Budget

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation