Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Team Group
67 Overall Score
vs
Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Crucial
87 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

82 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This SSD is generally well-received, with users praising its speed, value, and performance in NAS and gaming setups. Some minor drawbacks include the need to manually attach heatsinks and the presence of a status LED that some find unnecessary. Overall, it's seen as a solid, affordable choice for everyday users and enthusiasts alike.

Pros
  • Fast read/write speeds
  • Good value for money
  • Works well in NAS
  • Easy installation
  • Reliable performance
Cons
  • Manual heatsink attachment
  • Unnecessary status LED
  • Not top-tier speed
👍 Speed 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Ease of installation 2
🤔 Build quality 2
🤔 Thermal management 2
👎 Led indicator 1

Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

82 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

The Crucial T700 Gen5 NVMe SSD is widely praised for its blazing sequential speeds, often exceeding specs, and its effective heatsink design. However, users note that random performance gains over Gen4 are minimal, and the large heatsink can complicate installation and limit expansion options. Overall, it's a top-tier choice for those wanting maximum performance, but it requires careful consideration of physical fit and airflow.

Pros
  • Blazing sequential speeds
  • Effective heatsink design
  • Exceeds advertised speeds
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Good value for performance
Cons
  • Large heatsink size
  • Minimal random performance gains
  • Complicates installation
  • Limits expansion options
  • Requires adequate airflow
👍 Sequential speed 6
👍 Heatsink design 5
🤔 Random performance 3
👎 Installation difficulty 4
👍 Value for money 2
👍 Build quality 2

Scores

Budget
Team Group
91
Crucial
86
Workstation
Team Group
61
Crucial
87
Gaming
Team Group
52
Crucial
85
Console
Team Group
43
Crucial
84
Laptop
Team Group
57
Crucial
75
Portable
Team Group
17
Crucial
22

Specifications

Team Group T-FORCE G50Crucial T700
Drive
Capacity
512
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
5,000
11,700
Sequential Write (MB/s)
3,500
9,500
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,350,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,400,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗✓★
ControllerInnoGritPhison E26
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
325
600
MTBF (hours)
3,000,000
No data
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✓✓

Pros & Cons

Team Group T-FORCE G50 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Strong affordability (77th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (34th percentile)

Crucial T700 1TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong speed (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Crucial T700

Scores 87 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Team Group T-FORCE G50 Better at:

Budget

Crucial T700 Better at:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation