SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 Overall Score
vs
Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Lexar
49 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
86
Lexar
19
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Lexar
49
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Lexar
40
Budget
SanDisk
72
Lexar
44
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Lexar
51
Portable
SanDisk
24
Lexar
12

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Lexar NM620 0843367123148
Drive
Capacity
8,000
256
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
3,300
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
3,000
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
No data
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
No data
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
No data
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
No data
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Lexar NM620 0843367123148 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (70th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation