Timetec
Timetec
69 Overall Score
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
Kingstone
29 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Timetec
88 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews
This RAM kit is praised for its performance, stability, and value. Users report it works flawlessly at advertised speeds and even overclocks well, making it a great budget-friendly choice for builds. The only minor issue is a lack of detailed information, such as weight, in the Q&A.
Pros
- Works at advertised speeds
- Stable under load
- Good value for money
- Overclocks well
- Aesthetic design
Cons
- Lack of detailed specs in Q&A
Performance 5
Stability 4
Value for money 4
Overclocking 2
Build quality 2
Compatibility 3
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Timetec | Kingstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16 | 11★ |
| Timings | 16-18-18-38 | 11-11-11 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.5 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Timetec
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (77th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
- Strong affordability (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Pricing
Timetec0.514score per dollar
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)0.271score per dollar
Timetec offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Timetec
Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
