Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"

Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"

Samsung
50 Overall Score
vs
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte
88 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Samsung
39
Gigabyte
87
Office
Samsung
44
Gigabyte
85
Professional
Samsung
60
Gigabyte
83
Creative
Samsung
69
Gigabyte
81
Entertainment
Samsung
51
Gigabyte
80
Portable
Samsung
17
Gigabyte
15

Specifications

Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"
Display
Size75"32"
Resolution3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Panel TypeVAOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate60 Hz240 Hz
Response Time8 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness350 nits250 nits
Color Gamut72% NTSC99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-Bit10bit
HDRHDR10+DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR10+HDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports32
DisplayPort1
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount400x400100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power129W
Weight8.53 kg

Pros & Cons

Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75"

  • Strong display (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong color (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong feature (72nd percentile)
  • Below average performance (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average portability (24th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (28th percentile)

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

Winner: Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"

Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.

Samsung QBC QB75C-N 75" Better at:

Portable

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment