Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

Fujifilm
34 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
100
Fujifilm
38
Landscape
Sigma
100
Fujifilm
46
Budget
Sigma
99
Fujifilm
35
Travel
Sigma
93
Fujifilm
46
Video Cinema
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
29
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
87
Fujifilm
41
Portrait
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
21
Professional
Sigma
84
Fujifilm
38
Street
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
35

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSFujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm70 mm
Elements2011
Groups149
Aspherical Elements4★1
ED Elements5★2
Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-6.74.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm G
FormatAPS-C★medium-format
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.61 kg0.44 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLAAuto Focus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance170 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:2★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fujifilm GF 35-70mm f/4.5-5.6 WR 35-70mm

  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average social proof (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports