Fujifilm GF 100-200mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WR

Fujifilm GF 100-200mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WR

Fujifilm
52 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Fujifilm
45
Sigma
100
Landscape
Fujifilm
59
Sigma
100
Budget
Fujifilm
57
Sigma
99
Travel
Fujifilm
49
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
64
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
55
Sigma
87
Portrait
Fujifilm
57
Sigma
85
Professional
Fujifilm
63
Sigma
84
Street
Fujifilm
53
Sigma
80

Specifications

Fujifilm GF 100-200mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WRSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min100 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements2020
Groups1314
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements25★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/3.5
Min Aperturef/5.63.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm GSony E
Formatmedium-formatAPS-C★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.90 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLMHLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm GF 100-200mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports