Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star
50 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Brightin Star
41
Sigma
100
Landscape
Brightin Star
20
Sigma
100
Budget
Brightin Star
43
Sigma
99
Travel
Brightin Star
29
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Brightin Star
24
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Brightin Star
19
Sigma
87
Portrait
Brightin Star
31
Sigma
85
Professional
Brightin Star
20
Sigma
84
Street
Brightin Star
29
Sigma
80

Specifications

Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements620
Groups414
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.73.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades10★9
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.33 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread43 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyHLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports