OM System M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC 1.25 IS PRO 300-800mm
OM System
54 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
98 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Landscape
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Street
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC 1.25 IS PRO 300-800mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 150 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 400 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 28 | 20 |
| Groups | 18 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 5 |
| Coating | Z Coating Nano | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/4.5 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.88 kg | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 95 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | High-speed Imager AF (MSC) | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 8 stops★ | 6 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.30 m | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:7.7 | 1:2 |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko 150-400mm f/4.5 TC 1.25 IS PRO 300-800mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (78th percentile)
- Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.