Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews

The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Weather sealing
  • Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
  • Not a macro lens
  • Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
  • No zoom capability
  • Tapered design may look odd
👍 Image quality 10
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Portability 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Weather sealing 4

Scores

Budget
Tamron
97
Fujifilm
69
Macro
Tamron
92
Fujifilm
65
Landscape
Tamron
87
Fujifilm
58
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
63
Professional
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
71
Street
Tamron
83
Fujifilm
74
Portrait
Tamron
82
Fujifilm
54
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Fujifilm
64
Travel
Tamron
81
Fujifilm
67

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDFujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements209
Groups136
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements22
Coatingfluorine coatingNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★stepping motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★350 mm
Max Magnification1:3.81:7

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm is €373 cheaper (1.9x less).

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.125score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.176score per dollar

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm offers 1.4x better value for money

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider