Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm
66 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Tamron
97
Fujifilm
74
Macro
Tamron
95
Fujifilm
58
Landscape
Tamron
87
Fujifilm
69
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
68
Professional
Tamron
85
Fujifilm
62
Street
Tamron
83
Fujifilm
72
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Fujifilm
55
Travel
Tamron
81
Fujifilm
82
Portrait
Tamron
81
Fujifilm
45

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDFujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm50 mm
Elements2011
Groups139
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23★
Coatingfluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.12.8-4.8
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.24 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motorLinear motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops—7 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★240 mm
Max Magnification1:3.8★0.3x

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider