Nikon NIKKOR Z 20054 600mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20054 600mm

Nikon
40 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron
97 Overall Score

Scores

Video Cinema
Nikon
48
Tamron
98
Budget
Nikon
40
Tamron
96
Professional
Nikon
49
Tamron
92
Macro
Nikon
47
Tamron
91
Travel
Nikon
33
Tamron
87
Portrait
Nikon
36
Tamron
85
Landscape
Nikon
47
Tamron
84
Street
Nikon
38
Tamron
79
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
48
Tamron
75

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20054 600mmTamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min600 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max600 mm70 mm
Elements1616
Groups1212
Aspherical Elements03★
ED Elements4★2
CoatingNano Crystal & Super Integrated CoatingsFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight3.81 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave MotorRXD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance4.40 m190 mm★
Max Magnification1:71:4.8

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20054 600mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20054 600mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Scores 97 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider