Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

Insta360
36 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Insta360
16
Sigma
100
Budget
Insta360
39
Sigma
99
Macro
Insta360
19
Sigma
96
Travel
Insta360
17
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Insta360
46
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Insta360
31
Sigma
87
Portrait
Insta360
61
Sigma
85
Professional
Insta360
39
Sigma
84
Street
Insta360
44
Sigma
80

Specifications

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typefisheyezoom
Focal Length Min6 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max6 mm300 mm
Elements—20
Groups—14
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—5★
Coating—water- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountInsta360 X5Sony E
Format—APS-C★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight—0.61 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—HLA
Stabilization—✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—170 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2★

Pros & Cons

Insta360 X5 CINSBAHB 6mm

  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports