Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Nikon
73 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

Tamron
98 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

This classic Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8 lens is praised for its rugged build, sharp optics, and fast autofocus, making it a favorite among professionals for landscapes, portraits, and reportage. Users note it performs best on lower-megapixel FX cameras like the D700 and 35mm film bodies, while cautioning about potential autofocus squeak in some copies and heavy weight. Despite its age, it remains a versatile and reliable wide-angle zoom that delivers excellent color and contrast.

Pros
  • Rugged all-metal construction
  • Sharp optics with excellent contrast
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Versatile for landscapes, portraits, and reportage
  • Accepts 77mm filters
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • Potential autofocus squeak in some copies
  • Not ideal for high-megapixel FX cameras
  • Shadow from built-in flash at 17mm
  • Expensive
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 3

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a versatile and affordable alternative to Sony's GM lenses. Users appreciate its performance in portraits and low light, though some note the plastic build and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Overall, it is considered an excellent value for both enthusiasts and professionals.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile focal range
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Plastic build quality
  • No weather sealing
  • Zoom ring reversed from focus ring
  • Slightly long for discrete use
  • Colors slightly duller than GM lenses
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Low light performance 5

Scores

Budget
Nikon
71
Tamron
96
Video Cinema
Nikon
64
Tamron
96
Professional
Nikon
60
Tamron
93
Portrait
Nikon
76
Tamron
91
Macro
Nikon
65
Tamron
87
Street
Nikon
60
Tamron
83
Landscape
Nikon
48
Tamron
80
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
45
Tamron
78
Travel
Nikon
45
Tamron
73

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm75 mm
Elements—17
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements22
Coating—Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.74 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor (SWM)VXD linear motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm is €4,839 cheaper (5.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm0.012score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm0.096score per dollar

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm offers 8.0x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 1960 17-35mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 75mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider