Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Nikon
74
Sigma
100
Landscape
Nikon
88
Sigma
100
Budget
Nikon
98
Sigma
99
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Sigma
87
Travel
Nikon
92
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Sigma
90
Portrait
Nikon
78
Sigma
85
Professional
Nikon
83
Sigma
84
Street
Nikon
81
Sigma
80

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm300 mm
Elements1920
Groups1514
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements15★
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatingswater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/3.5
Min Aperture4-6.33.5-6.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg★0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motor★HLA
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x1:2★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

Wildlife Sports

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroPortraitLandscapeVideo Cinema