Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

82 out of 100 high confidence 117 reviews

The Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS lens is widely praised as an excellent all-in-one travel and walkaround lens for APS-C E-mount cameras. Users consistently highlight its sharpness, compact size, light weight, and versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range. While many note it is not ideal for low light and some report significant vignetting at the wide end, the overall sentiment is very positive, with most considering it a great value kit lens upgrade.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Versatile 27-200mm equivalent zoom range
  • Effective optical image stabilization
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
Cons
  • Significant vignetting at 18mm wide end
  • Not ideal for low light photography
  • Variable aperture limits brightness at telephoto
  • Some copies may have quality control issues
  • Slight autofocus lag compared to premium lenses
👍 Image quality 35
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Value for money 18
👎 Vignetting 6
👎 Low light performance 10
👍 Zoom range 25

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, color reproduction, and value for money, especially on a budget. Users praise its compact size, metal mount, and low-light performance, though some note the autofocus is noisy and slow compared to USM lenses. A few isolated complaints mention build quality feeling plasticky or the lens not working at all, but the majority find it a reliable workhorse for both crop sensor and full-frame cameras.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness and color
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Metal mount for durability
  • Great low-light performance
  • Good value for budget buyers
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus
  • Slow autofocus compared to USM
  • Plasticky build quality
  • Lacks image stabilization
  • Large manual focus ring angle
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Build quality 4
👎 Autofocus noise 4
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👍 Compatibility 2

Scores

Budget
Sony
100
Canon
66
Macro
Sony
67
Canon
95
Portrait
Sony
90
Canon
75
Street
Sony
88
Canon
82
Travel
Sony
86
Canon
60
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
64
Video Cinema
Sony
82
Canon
78
Professional
Sony
74
Canon
74
Landscape
Sony
73
Canon
55

Specifications

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm28 mm
Elements1611
Groups128
Aspherical Elements12★
ED Elements2★1
Coating—Canon Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★5
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-M
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✗—
Weight0.33 kg0.12 kg★
Filter Thread55 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★STM
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm94 mm★
Max Magnification0.29x1.2x★

Pros & Cons

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 91 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider