Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Viltrox
63 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
98 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Viltrox 20mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its exceptional value, sharp optics, and lightweight build, making it a favorite for landscape, video, and everyday photography. However, many users report inconsistent autofocus performance, with some experiencing hunting or inaccuracy even after firmware updates. The lens hood is noted as a minor weak point, and the lack of an AF/MF switch on the lens body can be confusing. Overall, it delivers impressive image quality for its price, but autofocus reliability remains a key concern.

Pros
  • Exceptional value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Solid metal build
  • Good color and contrast
Cons
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Autofocus hunting in AF-C mode
  • Lens hood does not lock tightly
  • No AF/MF switch on lens body
  • Focus ring has no hard stop in manual mode
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Image quality 10
👎 Autofocus performance 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Weight and portability 5
👎 Lens hood 2

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No customer feedback yet

Scores

Landscape
Viltrox
64
Sigma
100
Budget
Viltrox
65
Sigma
99
Macro
Viltrox
59
Sigma
96
Travel
Viltrox
48
Sigma
93
Video Cinema
Viltrox
64
Sigma
91
Portrait
Viltrox
61
Sigma
90
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
59
Sigma
87
Professional
Viltrox
70
Sigma
84
Street
Viltrox
61
Sigma
79

Specifications

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min75 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max75 mm300 mm
Elements1620
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements24★
ED Elements35★
CoatingHD Nano Multi-layer Coatingwater- and oil-repellent coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/1.23.5-6.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.67 kg0.61 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★HLA
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance880 mm170 mm★
Max Magnification1:101:2

Pros & Cons

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm is €163 cheaper (1.3x less).

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm0.104score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.129score per dollar

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 1.2x better value for money

Viltrox 75mm f/1.2 AF 75mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider