Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Meike
47 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Meike
33
Street
Sigma
86
Meike
43
Macro
Sigma
82
Meike
45
Portrait
Sigma
81
Meike
36
Travel
Sigma
80
Meike
40
Budget
Sigma
75
Meike
40
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Meike
30
Landscape
Sigma
71
Meike
33
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Meike
27

Specifications

Sigma 207975Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomprime
Focal Length Min10 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements138
Groups105
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.22 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm400 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm is €460 cheaper (3.1x less).

Sigma 2079750.126score per dollar
vs
Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm0.213score per dollar

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm offers 1.7x better value for money

Sigma 207975

Meike 35mm f/1.4 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider