Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM

Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM

Canon
75 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Canon
84
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Canon
77
Nikon
94
Travel
Canon
76
Nikon
92
Landscape
Canon
92
Nikon
88
Professional
Canon
78
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
77
Nikon
82
Street
Canon
65
Nikon
81
Portrait
Canon
52
Nikon
78
Macro
Canon
67
Nikon
74

Specifications

Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USMNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm200 mm
Elements1819
Groups1415
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements11
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.70 kg0.57 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USM★stepping motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification0.24x0.28x★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Canon L EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Better at:

Landscape

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports