Tokina atx-i 17-35mm f/4 FF 35mm

Tokina atx-i 17-35mm f/4 FF 35mm

Tokina
47 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Tokina
46
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Tokina
47
Nikon
94
Travel
Tokina
49
Nikon
92
Landscape
Tokina
56
Nikon
88
Professional
Tokina
56
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Tokina
45
Nikon
82
Street
Tokina
43
Nikon
81
Portrait
Tokina
35
Nikon
78
Macro
Tokina
63
Nikon
74

Specifications

Tokina atx-i 17-35mm f/4 FF 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements1319
Groups1215
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements2★1
CoatingAnti-Reflective Multi-Layer Lens CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon FNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.57 kg★0.57 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSD-M AF Motorstepping motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:4.7★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Tokina atx-i 17-35mm f/4 FF 35mm

  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)
  • Strong build (67th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports