Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

Nikon
85 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

Fujifilm
48 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

85 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

This Nikon 18-300mm lens is widely praised for its versatility, sharpness, and value. Users love the all-in-one zoom range that replaces multiple lenses, especially for travel, events, and photographing kids. A few note the autofocus can be slow or imprecise, and some received the wrong item initially, but overall satisfaction is very high.

Pros
  • Versatile all-in-one zoom range
  • Sharp images across zoom range
  • Great value for money
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Effective vibration reduction
Cons
  • Autofocus can be slow or imprecise
  • Some units shipped with wrong lens
  • Not sharp at full zoom (past 150mm)
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Autofocus not silent
👍 Versatility 6
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Value for money 5
🤔 Autofocus performance 4
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Vibration reduction 3

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

Owners of the Fujifilm GF 80mm lens are overwhelmingly positive, praising its exceptional sharpness, beautiful rendering, and creamy bokeh. Many consider it a must-have for portrait work on GFX cameras, despite noting a somewhat noisy autofocus motor. The lens is described as a favorite even among users of other high-end systems like Leica and Hasselblad.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful rendering
  • Creamy bokeh
  • Great for portraits
  • Lightweight
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus motor
  • Minor chromatic aberration
👍 Sharpness 4
👍 Bokeh 3
👍 Rendering 3
👎 Autofocus noise 2
👍 Portrait use 3
👍 Build quality 2

Scores

Portrait
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
39
Video Cinema
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
48
Budget
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
43
Street
Nikon
81
Fujifilm
41
Landscape
Nikon
75
Fujifilm
45
Travel
Nikon
72
Fujifilm
37
Professional
Nikon
71
Fujifilm
49
Macro
Nikon
69
Fujifilm
38
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
65
Fujifilm
40

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VRFujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm80 mm
Focal Length Max80 mm80 mm
Elements1712
Groups139
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements4★2
CoatingNano Crystal and Super Integrated CoatingsFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperture2.8-4f/1.7
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon FFujifilm G
FormatAPS-C★medium-format
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.50 kg★0.80 kg
Filter Thread72 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SAutomatic
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification0.22x★0.15x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong optical (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR is €4,635 cheaper (5.9x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR0.090score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm0.009score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR offers 10.0x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

Fujifilm GF80mmF1.7 R WR 35-63mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider