Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox
77 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Viltrox 35mm f/1.8 AF lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and impressive image quality at a budget-friendly price. Many users compare it favorably to more expensive Nikkor lenses, noting its solid build and silent operation. A few minor cons include a heavy vignette, a poor lens hood design, and a slightly cheap-feeling build for some. Overall, it is highly recommended as a great value walk-around lens for Nikon Z and Sony E mount cameras.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Great value for the price
  • Silent operation
  • Solid all-metal construction
Cons
  • Heavy vignetting
  • Poor lens hood design
  • Cheap-feeling build for some
  • Bulky for an f/1.8 lens
  • Focus-by-wire manual focus
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 6
👍 Value for money 8
🤔 Build quality 6
👎 Vignetting 2
👎 Lens hood design 2

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Video Cinema
Viltrox
98
Tamron
81
Budget
Viltrox
74
Tamron
96
Macro
Viltrox
63
Tamron
91
Landscape
Viltrox
66
Tamron
90
Portrait
Viltrox
90
Tamron
85
Professional
Viltrox
89
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
75
Tamron
85
Street
Viltrox
83
Tamron
81
Travel
Viltrox
68
Tamron
81

Specifications

Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1320
Groups1013
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements22
Coatingwater and smudge-resistant coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/4
Min Aperturef/1.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.35 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance340 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification0.15x1:2.8★

Pros & Cons

Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Viltrox II EVO 35mm F1.8 II EVO 35mm Better at:

PortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports