Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

Viltrox
55 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
86 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Viltrox
62
Panasonic
98
Budget
Viltrox
53
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Viltrox
57
Panasonic
86
Travel
Viltrox
48
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Viltrox
50
Panasonic
86
Street
Viltrox
59
Panasonic
80
Professional
Viltrox
57
Panasonic
80
Portrait
Viltrox
48
Panasonic
77
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
57
Panasonic
77

Specifications

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements1017
Groups813
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements24★
CoatingHD nano multicoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/1.84-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.34 kg★0.41 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance340 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification1:10★0.5x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 35mm f/1.8 II EVO 35mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports