Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Brightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm

Brightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm

Brightin Star
54 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
56
Brightin Star
47
Portrait
Sigma
55
Brightin Star
46
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Brightin Star
38
Macro
Sigma
16
Brightin Star
47
Street
Sigma
45
Brightin Star
40
Professional
Sigma
39
Brightin Star
32
Travel
Sigma
38
Brightin Star
33
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
36
Brightin Star
26
Landscape
Sigma
31
Brightin Star
33

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSBrightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm
Optics
Type—prime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm50 mm
Elements—7
Groups—5
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture—f/0.95
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—13★
Build
Mount—Fujifilm X
Format—APS-C★
Weight—0.44 kg★
Filter Thread—62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—manual focus only
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—500 mm★

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Brightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Brightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm

Scores 54 overall, wins 2 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 18 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Brightin Star AF 50mm f/0.95 II 50mm Better at:

MacroLandscape