Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

TTArtisan
50 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
TTArtisan
41
Portrait
Nikon
89
TTArtisan
44
Street
Nikon
86
TTArtisan
44
Budget
Nikon
86
TTArtisan
45
Macro
Nikon
85
TTArtisan
68
Landscape
Nikon
83
TTArtisan
49
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
TTArtisan
36
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
TTArtisan
31
Travel
Nikon
75
TTArtisan
38

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm10 mm
Elements1313
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements30
CoatingMulti-CoatedHD multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.34 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.262:1

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong optical (74th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 10mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider