Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6

Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6

Canon
80 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6

78 out of 100 high confidence 98 reviews

The Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM lens is widely praised as a versatile all-in-one walk-around lens for APS-C cameras. Users consistently highlight its silent and smooth STM autofocus, effective image stabilization, and useful zoom range that covers wide-angle to short telephoto. While image quality is considered very good for a kit-level zoom, some reviewers note softness at extreme focal lengths, barrel distortion at 18mm, and a variable aperture that limits low-light performance. Build quality is described as mostly plastic but adequate, though the focus-by-wire manual ring and occasional stiff zoom ring draw criticism.

Pros
  • Silent and smooth STM autofocus
  • Effective image stabilization
  • Versatile 18-135mm zoom range
  • Good image quality for a kit lens
  • Lightweight and compact design
Cons
  • Softness at extreme focal lengths
  • Barrel distortion at 18mm
  • Variable aperture limits low-light use
  • Focus-by-wire manual ring
  • Plastic build feels cheap
👍 Autofocus performance 25
👍 Image quality 30
👍 Image stabilization 12
🤔 Build quality 15
👍 Zoom range versatility 22
👎 Low light performance 10

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
91
Professional
Nikon
88
Canon
65
Portrait
Nikon
86
Canon
71
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
66
Street
Nikon
82
Canon
72
Landscape
Nikon
81
Canon
74
Video Cinema
Nikon
81
Canon
74
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
72
Canon
70
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
68

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mmCanon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm135 mm
Elements1316
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/5.6
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg★0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorNANO USM★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★390 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 Better at:

Budget