Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

Rokinon
35 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 31 reviews

The Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 manual focus lens is a favorite among astrophotographers and landscape shooters on a budget, delivering sharp images and excellent light-gathering ability for its price. Users consistently praise its value and image quality, though several note that achieving precise focus can be tricky without autofocus or focus confirmation. Minor build concerns like a loose lens mount and cheap hood are mentioned, but overall it's highly recommended for its intended use.

Pros
  • Excellent image sharpness
  • Great value for the price
  • Fast f/2.0 aperture
  • Good for astrophotography
  • Lightweight build
Cons
  • Manual focus only
  • Difficult precise focusing
  • Focus confirmation not working
  • Loose lens mount
  • Cheap lens hood
👍 Image quality 14
👍 Value for money 8
👍 Astrophotography performance 10
👎 Manual focus difficulty 7
🤔 Build quality 5
👎 Lens mount looseness 2

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
28
Budget
Nikon
85
Rokinon
28
Street
Nikon
84
Rokinon
28
Macro
Nikon
84
Rokinon
57
Portrait
Nikon
84
Rokinon
26
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
24
Landscape
Nikon
79
Rokinon
33
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Rokinon
20
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
23

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedUMC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★8
Build
MountNikon ZPentax K
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg★0.58 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★200 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon CS 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS 16mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (79th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports