Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon L IS USM 14-35mm

Canon L IS USM 14-35mm

Canon
24 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
26
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
33
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
28
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
9
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
30
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
30
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
21
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
27
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
24

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon L IS USM 14-35mm
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/14
Min Aperturef/2.8—
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon Z—
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon L IS USM 14-35mm

  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports