Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo UM2267

Altura Photo
74 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Altura Photo
91
Nikon
88
Professional
Altura Photo
56
Nikon
89
Budget
Altura Photo
69
Nikon
85
Street
Altura Photo
76
Nikon
84
Portrait
Altura Photo
64
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Altura Photo
63
Nikon
82
Landscape
Altura Photo
52
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Altura Photo
58
Nikon
73
Travel
Altura Photo
56
Nikon
70

Specifications

Altura Photo UM2267Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min—17 mm
Focal Length Max—28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coatingmulticoated glass opticsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/2.8
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountScrew-on lens fits camera lenses with a 49mm front filter threadNikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.30 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance45 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Altura Photo UM2267

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Altura Photo UM2267

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Altura Photo UM2267 Better at:

Macro

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports