Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

OM System
59 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

85 out of 100 medium confidence 27 reviews

This M.Zuiko 40-150mm lens is widely praised for being lightweight and compact, delivering sharp images for its price point. Users are impressed with its value as a budget telephoto zoom for the Micro Four Thirds system, especially for outdoor daytime photography. A few note it struggles in low light and with fast-moving subjects, but most consider it a fantastic deal for hobbyists and travelers.

Pros
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Sharp image quality for the price
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good for daytime outdoor photography
  • Quiet and fast autofocus
Cons
  • Struggles in low light
  • Not suitable for fast-moving subjects
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Not weather sealed
  • Tromboning zoom mechanism
👍 Price value 18
🤔 Build quality 7
👎 Low light performance 6
👍 Weight and portability 10
👍 Image sharpness 9
👎 Weather sealing 3

Scores

Travel
Sony
98
OM System
75
Street
Sony
90
OM System
55
Budget
Sony
86
OM System
61
Video Cinema
Sony
84
OM System
47
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
OM System
49
Portrait
Sony
83
OM System
38
Landscape
Sony
82
OM System
54
Professional
Sony
78
OM System
42
Macro
Sony
66
OM System
44

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSOM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm150 mm
Elements913
Groups810
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements11
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.64-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony EMicro Four Thirds
FormatAPS-C★micro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.11 kg★0.19 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★900 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:6.25★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (66th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.344score per dollar
vs
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R0.247score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 1.4x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider