Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Sony
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, color reproduction, and value for money, especially on a budget. Users praise its compact size, metal mount, and low-light performance, though some note the autofocus is noisy and slow compared to USM lenses. A few isolated complaints mention build quality feeling plasticky or the lens not working at all, but the majority find it a reliable workhorse for both crop sensor and full-frame cameras.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness and color
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Metal mount for durability
  • Great low-light performance
  • Good value for budget buyers
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus
  • Slow autofocus compared to USM
  • Plasticky build quality
  • Lacks image stabilization
  • Large manual focus ring angle
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Build quality 4
👎 Autofocus noise 4
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👍 Compatibility 2

Scores

Travel
Sony
95
Canon
60
Macro
Sony
66
Canon
95
Budget
Sony
90
Canon
66
Street
Sony
89
Canon
82
Portrait
Sony
84
Canon
75
Video Cinema
Sony
84
Canon
78
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Canon
64
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
55
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
74

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mmCanon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements911
Groups88
Aspherical Elements4★2
ED Elements11
Coating—Canon Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★5
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-M
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.12 kg
Filter Thread41 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm94 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x1.2x★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 50mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider