Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 200-400mm

Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 200-400mm

Canon
15 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Canon
21
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
24
Street
Sony
90
Canon
15
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
16
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
21
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
18
Portrait
Sony
78
Canon
6
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
15
Macro
Sony
69
Canon
5

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 200-400mm
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm400 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/200
Min Aperture3.5-5.6—
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony E—
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★—
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 200-400mm

  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average aperture (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon L EF 200-400mm IS USM Extender 1.4x 200-400mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider