Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron
70 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm

45 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD VC lens receives mixed feedback from users. Some praise its versatility, lightweight design, and value for money, especially for travel and casual photography. However, several users report significant issues with autofocus reliability, image sharpness, and lens creep, with some experiencing failures after a short period. The lens seems to work well for some but has notable quality control and compatibility concerns.

Pros
  • Versatile zoom range
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Good value for money
  • Vibration compensation
  • Suitable for travel and casual use
Cons
  • Autofocus reliability issues
  • Soft image quality at times
  • Lens creep problem
  • Noisy autofocus operation
  • Poor low-light performance due to high f-stop
👎 Autofocus reliability 4
🤔 Image quality 5
👎 Build quality 3
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Portability 3
👎 Lens creep 2

Scores

Budget
Nikon
84
Tamron
74
Landscape
Nikon
68
Tamron
84
Macro
Nikon
73
Tamron
82
Portrait
Nikon
80
Tamron
75
Professional
Nikon
67
Tamron
80
Street
Nikon
77
Tamron
72
Travel
Nikon
71
Tamron
76
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
64
Tamron
74
Video Cinema
Nikon
70
Tamron
68

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmTamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm300 mm
Elements—19
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements24★
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingXR (Extra Refractive Index) glass
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-6.3
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg★0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SVXD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★490 mm
Max Magnification—1:3.5★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm is €72 cheaper (1.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

BudgetStreetPortrait

Tamron Di III VC AF020N700 28-300mm Better at:

MacroTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Also Consider