TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

TTArtisan
50 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

70 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The TTArtisan 27mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and good value, making it a popular choice for everyday carry and street photography. However, several users report issues with vignetting, soft edges, and occasional autofocus or exposure inconsistencies, especially in low light. While many find it a solid budget alternative to the Fuji 27mm pancake, some returned it due to the pronounced vignetting or lack of contrast.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Good value for the price
  • Sharp center image
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Easy-to-use aperture and focus rings
Cons
  • Pronounced vignetting
  • Soft edges and corners
  • Unreliable autofocus in low light
  • Inconsistent exposure with aperture changes
  • Lack of contrast and saturation
👍 Compactness and portability 6
👍 Value for money 5
🤔 Image sharpness 5
👎 Vignetting 4
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 3

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Scores

Travel
TTArtisan
53
Sony
94
Budget
TTArtisan
57
Sony
90
Street
TTArtisan
55
Sony
88
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
41
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
43
Sony
83
Portrait
TTArtisan
42
Sony
83
Landscape
TTArtisan
33
Sony
79
Professional
TTArtisan
37
Sony
77
Macro
TTArtisan
43
Sony
66

Specifications

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mmSony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min27 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max27 mm50 mm
Elements69
Groups58
Aspherical Elements—4★
ED Elements—1★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades8★7
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.09 kg★0.11 kg
Filter Thread39 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification—0.215x★

Pros & Cons

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

  • Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Strong macro (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm is €43 cheaper (1.2x less).

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm0.274score per dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.396score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 1.4x better value for money

TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider