Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Canon
80 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
68 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 58 reviews

The Canon RF-S 55-210mm lens is generally well-received, especially by beginners and travel photographers who value its lightweight design, sharp images, and fast autofocus. Many users praise its performance for outdoor sports and wildlife, though some note limitations in low light due to the slow aperture and occasional distortion. A few negative reviews mention autofocus issues and a restocking fee, but overall sentiment is positive.

Pros
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast autofocus
  • Good for outdoor sports
  • Great value for price
Cons
  • Slow aperture in low light
  • Noticeable distortion
  • Autofocus issues in some cases
  • Restocking fee for returns
  • No lens lock
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Lightweight design 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 10
👍 Value for money 9
👎 Low light performance 6
👍 Image stabilization 5

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Scores

Travel
Canon
91
Viltrox
72
Budget
Canon
90
Viltrox
65
Street
Canon
85
Viltrox
72
Video Cinema
Canon
82
Viltrox
62
Landscape
Canon
79
Viltrox
67
Portrait
Canon
78
Viltrox
62
Wildlife Sports
Canon
77
Viltrox
62
Professional
Canon
65
Viltrox
62
Macro
Canon
60
Viltrox
60

Specifications

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mmViltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min55 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max210 mm56 mm
Elements1111
Groups89
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements24★
CoatingSuper Spectra Coatingmulti-layer coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5f/16
Min Aperture5-7.1f/1.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon RFSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✗✓★
Weight0.27 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread55 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance730 mm550 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x1:9.09★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong versatility (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

No current pricing available

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Canon RF-S 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 210mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider