Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Meike
58 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

85 out of 100 high confidence 57 reviews

The Meike lenses are widely praised for delivering impressive sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value for money, often compared favorably to much more expensive native lenses. Users highlight solid build quality, smooth manual focus rings, and pleasing bokeh, though a small number note minor issues like aperture ring looseness or focus hunting in very low light. Overall, it's seen as a fantastic budget-friendly option for photographers seeking prime performance without breaking the bank.

Pros
  • Impressive sharpness for the price
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
  • Solid build quality
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Aperture ring has slight play on some units
  • Autofocus can hunt in very low light
  • Lens hood attachment can feel stiff
  • Minimum focus distance is somewhat long
  • Some chromatic aberration in high contrast scenes
👍 Sharpness 32
👍 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👍 Value for money 18
👍 Bokeh 14
🤔 Low light performance 10

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact size, and excellent low-light performance. Users love its versatility for travel, video, and long exposures, often pairing it with other lenses in the budget trinity. A few note it's not as premium as the S-line or Nikon 14-30mm, but most agree it offers incredible value for the price.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Great value for money
  • Versatile for travel and video
Cons
  • Not as premium as S-line lenses
  • Some prefer wider 14-30mm range
  • Build not as exceptional as premium trinity
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Low light performance 4
👍 Size and weight 5
👍 Versatility 5

Scores

Professional
Meike
48
Nikon
89
Portrait
Meike
48
Nikon
88
Macro
Meike
55
Nikon
84
Budget
Meike
54
Nikon
84
Street
Meike
55
Nikon
82
Video Cinema
Meike
48
Nikon
82
Landscape
Meike
47
Nikon
78
Travel
Meike
50
Nikon
73
Wildlife Sports
Meike
39
Nikon
72

Specifications

Meike 35mm F2.0 ENikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1113
Groups911
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements23★
CoatingMultilayered CoatingsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountNikon ZNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.29 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile

Pricing

Meike 35mm F2.0 E

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider