Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
43 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

79 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews

The Meike 35mm f/0.95 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its exceptional low-light capability, solid all-metal build, and dreamy bokeh, with many users praising its value for money compared to premium fast glass. However, a few issues are noted: the completely manual focus can be tricky and slows down shooting, some users find focusing wide-open challenging, and there are isolated complaints about a stiff mount and a camera compatibility error.

Pros
  • Fast f/0.95 aperture for low light
  • Solid all-metal build quality
  • Dreamy bokeh and character
  • Compact and lightweight for speed
  • Smooth focus and aperture rings
Cons
  • Completely manual focus slows shooting
  • Challenging to focus accurately wide open
  • Softness at maximum aperture
  • Stiff lens mount on some copies
  • No electronic communication or EXIF data
👍 Build quality 12
👍 Aperture and low light 10
👍 Bokeh and character 8
👍 Value for money 7
🤔 Manual focus 8
🤔 Sharpness 6

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Scores

Budget
Meike
40
Tamron
97
Macro
Meike
48
Tamron
92
Landscape
Meike
32
Tamron
87
Wildlife Sports
Meike
25
Tamron
85
Professional
Meike
32
Tamron
85
Street
Meike
39
Tamron
83
Portrait
Meike
40
Tamron
82
Video Cinema
Meike
32
Tamron
82
Travel
Meike
31
Tamron
81

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmTamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements1020
Groups713
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/4
Min Aperturef/0.954-7.1
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades13★9
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.38 kg★0.59 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.8★

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

Meike 35095 m43 35mm is €651 cheaper (5.3x less).

Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.280score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD0.125score per dollar

Meike 35095 m43 35mm offers 2.2x better value for money

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider