Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
44 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm

Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm

Sigma
92 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Meike
32
Sigma
94
Street
Meike
41
Sigma
90
Professional
Meike
35
Sigma
90
Macro
Meike
48
Sigma
86
Portrait
Meike
46
Sigma
86
Budget
Meike
41
Sigma
85
Landscape
Meike
32
Sigma
83
Video Cinema
Meike
33
Sigma
77
Wildlife Sports
Meike
27
Sigma
70

Specifications

Meike 35095 m43 35mmSigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm18 mm
Elements1013
Groups710
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/0.95f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades137
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.38 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Pros & Cons

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile

Pricing

Meike 35095 m43 35mm is €527 cheaper (4.5x less).

Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.289score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm0.136score per dollar

Meike 35095 m43 35mm offers 2.1x better value for money

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm

Scores 92 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 10-18mm f/2.8 DC DN 10-18mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider