Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR

Nikon
67 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
Nikon
74
Landscape
Canon
74
Nikon
55
Street
Canon
59
Nikon
73
Portrait
Canon
45
Nikon
69
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Nikon
69
Budget
Canon
66
Nikon
61
Professional
Canon
65
Nikon
63
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Nikon
63
Macro
Canon
51
Nikon
60

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMNikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm28 mm
Elements12—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg0.20 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMSTM (stepping motor)★
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm279 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (27th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR

Scores 67 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

BudgetLandscape

Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR Better at:

MacroStreetPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports