Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

Sony
58 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Canon
45
Sony
81
Travel
Canon
76
Sony
60
Landscape
Canon
74
Sony
54
Street
Canon
59
Sony
72
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Sony
70
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Sony
67
Professional
Canon
65
Sony
66
Budget
Canon
66
Sony
59
Macro
Canon
51
Sony
35

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMSony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm600 mm
Elements12—
Groups9—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements1★—
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingNano-AR-Beschichtung, fluorbeschichteten Vorderseite
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/1
Min Aperturef/4f/5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★DDSSM
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★—
Max Magnification0.24x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Scores 61 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelLandscape

Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS Better at:

StreetPortraitVideo CinemaWildlife Sports