OM System M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.2 PRO 45mm
OM System
52 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Portrait
Macro
Street
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| OM System M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.2 PRO 45mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | — |
| Focal Length Min | 45 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 45 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 14 | — |
| Groups | 10 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | Z Coating Nano | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.2 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | — |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 1:10★ | — |
Pros & Cons
OM System M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.2 PRO 45mm
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (75th percentile)
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Pricing
OM System M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.2 PRO 45mm
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: OM System M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.2 PRO 45mm
Scores 52 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
