Nikon Venus Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm

Nikon Venus Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm

Nikon
29 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
34
Sony
100
Street
Nikon
39
Sony
89
Travel
Nikon
11
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
29
Sony
84
Portrait
Nikon
58
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Nikon
35
Sony
83
Professional
Nikon
28
Sony
73
Landscape
Nikon
10
Sony
73
Macro
Nikon
15
Sony
68

Specifications

Nikon Venus Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mmSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min200 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm135 mm
Elements—16
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/3.5
Min Aperture—3.5-5.6
Constant—✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountSony E, Nikon ZSony E
Format—APS-C★
Weight1.78 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread—55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusLinear motor★
Stabilization✗✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance—450 mm★
Max Magnification0.15x0.29x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon Venus Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm

  • Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Nikon Venus Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF Telephoto 200mm

No current pricing available

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 19 specs.

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider