Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Tamron
55 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Sony
84 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Tamron
44
Sony
87
Budget
Tamron
67
Sony
87
Portrait
Tamron
62
Sony
82
Street
Tamron
48
Sony
79
Travel
Tamron
50
Sony
78
Landscape
Tamron
36
Sony
78
Video Cinema
Tamron
49
Sony
76
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
39
Sony
70
Macro
Tamron
46
Sony
68

Specifications

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mmSony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min16 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm70 mm
Elements16
Groups13
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements4
Coatingfluorine coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/4
Min Aperturef/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EF-SSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.54 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm250 mm
Max Magnification0.39x

Pros & Cons

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile

Pricing

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm is €938 cheaper (3.2x less).

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm0.129score per dollar
vs
Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm0.062score per dollar

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm offers 2.1x better value for money

Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony FE SEL2070G 20-70mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider