Philips SHP9500/00
Philips
56 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Philips SHP9500/00
88 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews
The Philips SHP9500 open-back headphones are widely praised for their exceptional value, offering audiophile-level sound quality at a budget price. Reviewers highlight the clear, detailed mids and treble, impressive soundstage, and outstanding comfort for long listening sessions. While the bass is tight and accurate, it may be insufficient for bassheads, and the open-back design causes significant sound leakage, making them unsuitable for public use. Build quality is decent for the price, though some note the plastic construction feels less premium.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money
- Clear and detailed mids and treble
- Impressive soundstage
- Very comfortable for long sessions
- Lightweight design
Cons
- Significant sound leakage
- Weak bass for bassheads
- Plastic build feels cheap
- No carrying pouch included
- Weak clamp force for active use
Value for money 6
Sound quality 7
Comfort 6
Bass performance 5
Build quality 4
Sound leakage 4
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Philips SHP9500/00 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | breathable ear cushion | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | steel | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | neodymium | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 50 mm★ | 45 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 12 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 35 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Philips SHP9500/00
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong sound (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average comfort (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
Philips SHP9500/000.538score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.447score per dollar
Philips SHP9500/00 offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 41 specs.
