Sennheiser HD 400S
Sennheiser
65 Overall Score
vs
QCY H3 PRO
QCY
86 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Work
Commute
Music
Studio
Calls
Specifications
| Sennheiser HD 400S | QCY H3 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | 0.23 kg |
| Ear Cushion | — | protein leather |
| Headband | — | leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 32 mm | 40 mm★ |
| Freq Min | 18 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 18 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Sennheiser HD 400S Closed-Back Over-Ear Wired Headphones – Lightweight Foldable Design, Inline Smart Remote, Balanced Sennheiser Sound, Comfortable Noise-Reducing Fit | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.399999976158142 m | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 55 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 0.17000000178813934 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 5 hours playback |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 3★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | QCY App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | Water-Resistant |
Pros & Cons
Sennheiser HD 400S
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (71st percentile)
- Strong anc (69th percentile)
QCY H3 PRO
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Pricing
Sennheiser HD 400S0.962score per dollar
vs
QCY H3 PRO1.230score per dollar
QCY H3 PRO offers 1.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: QCY H3 PRO
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 35 specs.
