HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5 White
HyperRender
31 Overall Score
vs
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual EVO OC 8GB GDDR6
ASUS
61 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5 White
62 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews
The RX 580 receives mixed feedback. Many users praise it as a budget-friendly upgrade for older PCs, noting improved gaming performance at 1080p and smooth operation for basic tasks. However, several verified buyers report serious issues like display artifacts, black screens, and non-functional ports, making the card unreliable for some.
Pros
- Budget-friendly upgrade for old PCs
- Improved gaming performance at 1080p
- Smooth operation for basic tasks
- Good value for money
- Easy installation and driver recognition
Cons
- Display artifacts and glitches
- Black screen on Windows start button
- Non-functional HDMI port
- Only 2 of 3 DisplayPorts working
- Unreliable multi-monitor support
Value for money 4
Gaming performance 3
Display artifacts 2
Port functionality 3
Multi monitor support 2
Ease of installation 3
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual EVO OC 8GB GDDR6
90 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews
The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 is highly praised as a great 1080p card with excellent price-to-performance ratio. Users report smooth gaming, easy installation, and no issues over months of use. It runs hotter than 3-fan variants but is considered a solid upgrade from older GPUs like the GTX 1060.
Pros
- Excellent 1080p performance
- Great price-to-performance ratio
- Easy installation
- Reliable and stable
- Compact size fits well
Cons
- Runs hotter than 3-fan variants
- Not ideal for 4K gaming
- Limited for high-end 1440p
Performance 1080p 5
Price to performance 4
Ease of installation 3
Reliability 4
Thermal performance 2
4k gaming suitability 2
Scores
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ray Tracing
Content Creation
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
Specifications
| HyperRender Radeon RX 580 | ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual EVO OC | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 580 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | 14nm | Ada Lovelace |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 14 | 5★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6★ |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | No data | |
| Stream Processors | No data | |
| Tensor Cores | — | 96★ |
| RT Cores | 54★ | 24 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055★ | 15.109999656677246 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273★ | 15.109999656677246 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 295 | 115★ |
| Recommended PSU | 450 | 300★ |
| Cooler | Dual Fan | Dual Fan |
| Fans | 2 | 2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 4.0 |
| DisplayPort | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0★ | — |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4★ |
| Max Resolution | — | 8K (4320p) |
| Physical | ||
| Length | — | 225★ |
| Slot Width | 2 | 2 |
| Form Factor | Full Height | — |
| Weight | — | 1.36 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Upscaling | — | DLSS 3 |
| AV1 Encode | ✗ | ✓★ |
| DirectX | 12 | — |
| RGB | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
HyperRender Radeon RX 580 8GB GDDR5 White
- Strong affordability (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average feature (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average efficiency (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average raster (21st percentile)
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual EVO OC 8GB GDDR6
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong feature (72nd percentile)
- Below average ai (33rd percentile)
- Below average vram (33rd percentile)
Verdict
Winner: ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Dual EVO OC
Scores 61 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.