JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 Overall Score
vs
Philips A1105BK

Philips A1105BK

Philips
37 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
JLab
84
Philips
35
Commute
JLab
81
Philips
26
Travel
JLab
78
Philips
26
Budget
JLab
78
Philips
43
Fitness
JLab
78
Philips
38
Calls
JLab
77
Philips
24
Music
JLab
69
Philips
36

Specifications

JLab Jbuds Pods ANCPhilips A1105BK
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Stylestemear-hook
Ear TipsS, M, L—
Weight0.12 kg0.02 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicneodymium
Driver Size11 mm15 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance—16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✗—
CodecsSBC, AAC—
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typehybrid—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.4★—
Multipoint✓★—
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs★—
Charge Time0.16699999570846558 hrs★—
Fast Charging10 min for 2 hours playback—
ChargingUSB-C★—
Case Battery
Case Battery56 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✓★—
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant—
Touch Controls✓★—
AppJlab App—
Gaming Mode✓★—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIP55IPX2

Pros & Cons

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

Philips A1105BK

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (25th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness