AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5

AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5

AMD
85 Overall Score
vs
HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

HP
30 Overall Score

Scores

Productivity
AMD
100
HP
26
Server
AMD
95
HP
27
Ai Llm
AMD
88
HP
22
Efficiency
AMD
45
HP
59
Budget
AMD
52
HP
36
Gaming
AMD
50
HP
23

Specifications

AMD EPYC 4564PHP Celeron N4500
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesRyzen 5Celeron
Model4564PN4500
CodenameRaphaelJasper Lake
Classserverlaptop
Process5★10
Cores & Clocks
Cores16★2
P-cores16★2
Threads32★2
Base Clock
4,500
1,100
Boost Clock
5,700
2,800
Cache
L2 Cache16★3
L3 Cache64★4
Performance
PassMark Multi
64,357
1,759
PassMark Single
4,292
1,253
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR4
Max Speed
5,200
2,933
Max Memory
2,048
No data
ECC✓★✗
Platform & Power
SocketAM5Intel BGA 1338
PCIe5.03.0
PCIe Lanes28★8
TDP2006★
Max Turbo Power23020★
Unlocked✗✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsRadeon GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics

Pros & Cons

AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5

  • Strong ai (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong platform (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average affordability (10th percentile)10th %ile

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

  • Strong efficiency (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average ai (21st percentile)
  • Below average multi thread (24th percentile)
  • Below average single thread (25th percentile)

Pricing

AMD EPYC 4564P 16-core AM5

HP Celeron N4500 2-core Intel BGA 1338

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: AMD EPYC 4564P

Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.

AMD EPYC 4564P Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerProductivity

HP Celeron N4500 Better at:

Efficiency

Also Consider