Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
20 Overall Score
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026
LIYTIFOR
47 Overall Score
Scores
Product Photography
Streaming
Beginner
Video
Photography
Youtube
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Vlogging
Specifications
| Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | LIYTIFOR LR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/1.7-inch | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 80 MP★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 5K |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | JPEG/MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3.5"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.20 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average video (24th percentile)
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 2026
- Strong burst (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong sensor (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong video (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average display (31st percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.392score per dollar
vs
LIYTIFOR LR1 Black 20260.217score per dollar
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: LIYTIFOR LR1
Scores 47 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.
