Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Fujifilm
20 Overall Score
vs
Saneen X9

Saneen X9

Saneen
43 Overall Score

Scores

Product Photography
Fujifilm
12
Saneen
50
Photography
Fujifilm
14
Saneen
45
Video
Fujifilm
15
Saneen
44
Wedding Events
Fujifilm
13
Saneen
41
Beginner
Fujifilm
23
Saneen
41
Youtube
Fujifilm
15
Saneen
40
Sports Wildlife
Fujifilm
14
Saneen
40
Streaming
Fujifilm
20
Saneen
36
Vlogging
Fujifilm
15
Saneen
26
Travel
Fujifilm
13
Saneen
26

Specifications

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400Saneen X9
Sensor
TypeCMOSCMOS
Size1/1.7-inch1/2.3-inch
Megapixels10 MP80 MP★
Autofocus
Eye AF✗—
Animal AF✗—
Subject Detection✗—
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)—30 fps★
Electronic Shutter✗—
Video
Max Resolution—5K
Log Profile—✓★
Display & EVF
Screen Size—2.8"★
Touchscreen✗—
Articulating✗—
Build
Weight0.20 kg★—
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✗✓★
Bluetooth✗—
Hot Shoe✗—

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Below average sensor (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)

Saneen X9

  • Strong burst (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong sensor (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong video (79th percentile)
  • Below average display (30th percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green is €153 cheaper (4.0x less).

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green0.388score per dollar
vs
Saneen X90.212score per dollar

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green offers 1.8x better value for money

Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green

Verdict

★ Winner: Saneen X9

Scores 43 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 5 of 17 specs.

Saneen X9 Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Also Consider